The moral Imperative—I - Chambers, Oswald
(i.e., a law universal and binding on every rational will)
How Can I Do What I Ought to Do?
Strictly speaking, there is no disobedience possible to an imperative law, the only alternative being destruction. In this sense the moral law is not imperative, because it can be disobeyed and immediate destruction does not follow. And yet the moral law never alters, however much men disobey it; it can be violated, but it never alters. Remember, at the back of all human morality stands god.
1. Gods ought sold testament
The ten commandments were not given with any consideration for human ability or inability to keep them; they are the revelation of gods demands made of men and women who had declared that if god would make his law known, they would keep it. And all the people answered together, and said, all that the lord hath spoken we will do (exodus 19:8). And god spake all these words saying, . . . Thou shalt . . . Thou shalt not . . . (exodus 20:117). The commandments were given with the inexorable awfulness of almighty god; and the subsequent history of the people is the record of how they could not keep them.
The moral law ordained by god does not make itself weak to the weak, it does not palliate our short- comings, it takes no account of our heredity and our infirmities; it demands that we be absolutely moral. Not to recognise this is to be less than alive. The apostle Paul said, i was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and i died (Romans 7:9). Undress yourself morally and see how much you owe to your upbringing, to the circumstances you are in; when you have got rid of all that, there is little to stand before god in, certainly nothing to boast of. Immediately we come into actual human conditions we find inability with regard to the keeping of gods law, then comes in the equiv- ocationof course god wont demand it. Of course god will make allowances. Gods laws are not watered down to suit anyone; if god did that he would cease to be god. The moral law never alters for the noblest or the weakest; it remains abidingly and eternally the same.
Every man has an imperative something within him which makes him say i ought, even in the most degraded specimens of humanity the ought is there, and the bible tells us where it comes from it comes from god. The modern tendency is to leave god out and make our standard what is most useful to man. The utilitarian says that these distinct laws of conduct have been evolved by man for the benefit of man the greatest use to the greatest number. That is not the reason a thing is right; the reason a thing is right is that god is behind it. Gods oughts never alter; we never grow out of them. Our difficulty is that we find in ourselves this attitude ought to do this, but i wont; i ought to do that, but i don’t want to. That puts out of court the idea that if you teach men what is right they will do it they wont; what is needed is a power which will enable a man to do what he knows is right. We may say oh i wont count this time; but every bit of moral wrong is counted by god. The moral law exerts no coercion, neither does it allow any compromise. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all ( James 2:10). Once we realise this we see why it was necessary for Jesus Christ to come. The redemption is the reality which alters inability into ability.
2. Christs principles new testament if the oughts of the old testament were difficult to obey, our lords teaching is unfathomably more difficult. Remember, the commandments were given irrespective of human ability or inability to keep them; then when Jesus Christ came, instead of doing what we all too glibly say he did put something easier before men, he made it a hundredfold more difficult, because he goes behind the law to the disposition. There is an idea abroad to-day that because as Chris- tians we are not under law, but under grace, there- fore the ten commandments have no meaning for us what did Jesus say? Think not that i am come to destroy the law . . . : i am not come to destroy, but to fulfill (Matthew 5:17). The teaching of the sermon on the mount is overwhelmingly and disastrously penetrating. Jesus Christ does not simply say, thou shalt not do certain things; he demands that we have such a condition of heart that we never even think of doing them, every thought and imagination of heart and mind is to be unblameable in the sight of god. Who is sufficient for these things an unsullied purity that never lusts, a forgiving disposition that loves its enemies, a generous spirit that taketh not account of evil (rv)? That standard can produce only one thing in an open-eyed man, absolute despair.
What is the use of saying, all we need is to know what Jesus Christ teaches and then live up to it: where are you going to begin? If we are Christians we have to live according to the teaching of the sermon on the mount; and the marvel of Jesus Christs salvation is that he puts us in the place where we can fulfill all the old law and a great deal more.
Be careful not to be caught up in the clap-trap of to-day which says, i believe in the teachings of Jesus, but i dont see any need for the atonement. Men talk pleasant, patronising things about Jesus Christs teaching while they ignore his cross. By all means let us study Christs teaching, we do not think nearly enough along new testament lines, we are swamped by pagan standards, and as Christians we ought to allow Jesus Christs principles to work out in our brains as well as in our lives; but the teaching of Jesus apart from his atonement simply adds an ideal that leads to despair. What is the good of telling me that only the pure in heart can see god when i am impure? Of telling me to love my enemies when i hate them? I may keep it down but the spirit is there. Does Jesus Christ make it easier? He makes it a hundredfold more difficult! The purity god demands is impossible unless we can be re-made from within, and that is what Jesus Christ under- takes to do through the atonement. Jesus Christ did not come to tell men they ought to be holy there is an ought in every man that tells him that, and whenever he sees a holy character he may bluster and excuse himself as he likes, but he knows that is what he ought to be: he came to put us in the place where we can be holy, that is, he came to make us what he teaches we should be, that is the difference.
Our lords first requirement is a personal relationship to himself, and then obedience to his principles. Tolstoi blundered in applying the sermon on the mount practically without insisting on the need to be born again of the spirit first, and he had an enormous following of intellectual faddists, mere spring- cleaners. It is not a question of applying Jesus Christs principles to our actual life first of all, but of applying them to our relationship to himself, then as we keep our souls open in relation to him our conscience will decide how we are to act out of that relationship. The principles of Jesus Christ go to the very root of the matter, they have an intensely practical application to our moral life. For i say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and pharisees, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:20).
We said that the teaching of Jesus Christ apart from his atonement leads to despair; but if it produces the pauper condition, it is the right kind of despair. Blessed are the poor in spirit. . . . Conviction of sin will bring a man there, and so will the Ealisation of gods demands. The best expression for us is the 139th psalm, search me, o god; i can- not make my heart pure, i cannot alter my heredity, i cannot alter the dreams of my mind; search me, o god, and know my heart. That is the poverty of spirit jesus says is blessed; if you are in that condition, he says you can easily enter the kingdom of heaven. Why? Because god gives the almighty gift of salvation from sin to paupers; he gives the holy spirit to paupers (see Luke 11:13).
3. The new man present day
Jesus Christ, as representative man, accepted the responsibility of exhibiting on the human plane the absolute holiness of god; he lived up to gods standard in every detail of holy living and holy speaking and holy working, and his claim is that through the atonement he can put us in the place where we can do the same. The very disposition that was in him is put into me is it there? If it is not, i will have to answer for it. It is not that god puts the life of Jesus in front of us and says, do your best to follow him, but that the life also of Jesus is to be made manifest in our mortal flesh. When Christ is formed in us by regeneration (Galatians 4:19), we have to see that our human nature puts on the clothing that is worthy of the son of god. That is where our responsibility comes in not in being absolutely holy, but in seeing that we allow Jesus Christ to be absolutely holy in us. Regeneration does not resolve a human being into imbecility, it lifts him powerfully into oneness with god in Christ Jesus.
We shall come to find that being not under the law, but under grace does not mean we are so free from the law that it does not matter now what we do; it means that in our actual lives we can fulfill all the requirements of the law of god.